tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post2564976447156432484..comments2023-10-26T15:06:30.940+00:00Comments on AIMeD Corporation: One!Roborat, Ph.Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04845879517177508741noreply@blogger.comBlogger34125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-29813237136174082252013-06-10T14:36:01.850+00:002013-06-10T14:36:01.850+00:00It is truly a nice and helpful piece of informatio...It is truly a nice and helpful piece of information. I am satisfied that <br />you just shared this useful information with us. Please <br />stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.<br /><br /><br /><br />Feel free to surf to my web site <a href="http://kebek2point0.org/wiki/index.php?title=Utilisateur:Kristin46" rel="nofollow">weight loss calculator</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-14279073947509674262007-12-06T07:30:00.000+00:002007-12-06T07:30:00.000+00:00"Also notice they are cutting L2 cache - some may ..."Also notice they are cutting L2 cache - some may say to make dies size smaller, but this should also help the thermals out a bit too...."<BR/><BR/>This also exposes another AMDism .... when Brisbane launched with higher L2 latencies, they said the wanted to accomodate larger caches in the future... but it appears they are not going to, nor had plans to, increase that cache.<BR/><BR/>Truth is... they L2 increased latency is yet a further indicator that the 65 nm process is a bit lacking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-39637154977644774102007-12-05T21:10:00.000+00:002007-12-05T21:10:00.000+00:00Giant - nice link. This is further supporting evi...Giant - nice link. This is further supporting evidence of the 65nm disaster.<BR/><BR/>They are moving over all the 90nm products to 65nm, but cutting the top 2 bins? Hmmmm... let's take our highest price part and not produce it on 65nm - what other reason could there be other than they CAN'T produce it on 65nm?!? <BR/><BR/>Well now that I think about it perhaps they don't want to go through the embarassment of having their K8 65nm beat or match K10?!?<BR/><BR/>Also notice they are cutting L2 cache - some may say to make dies size smaller, but this should also help the thermals out a bit too....<BR/><BR/>At least it does look they have finally swallowed their pride and realized it is more profitable short term to make K8's until they get K10 sorted out. Unfortunately for their shareholders, the market had to "hammer" (pun intended) the AMD stock price for Ruiz to finally remember he is running a business. There are times where he looks like he is just winging it though and lacks a short and long term plan (other than 'profitability is a priority'. Gee, thanks for that nugget!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-46698874054614370402007-12-05T18:38:00.000+00:002007-12-05T18:38:00.000+00:00Yuck giant, don't compare stock prices like that. ...Yuck giant, don't compare stock prices like that. You have to compare them in terms of gain/loss PERCENTAGE over a period of time.Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03882302503203420805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-40661648560522574402007-12-05T16:12:00.000+00:002007-12-05T16:12:00.000+00:00AMD is at $9.09 and falling. INTC is holding stead...AMD is at $9.09 and falling. INTC is holding steady at $27 - or nearly triple AMD's stock price.<BR/><BR/>AMD is continuing with K8 on the desktop: <BR/><BR/>http://www.dailytech.com/AMD+Resurrects+K8+Architecture+for+2008+Roadmap/article9899.htm<BR/><BR/>They need some product to sell for 2008, since Phenom was shipped with serious bugs. To fix these bugs causes 20% performance penalty, dropping K10 below K8 performance.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04674699447174785970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-61340705916109062612007-12-05T09:13:00.000+00:002007-12-05T09:13:00.000+00:00Hmmm... Q9300 (45nm quad, 2.5GHz, though only 6MB ...Hmmm... Q9300 (45nm quad, 2.5GHz, though only 6MB total L2 cache) will go for ~$270 during the 45nm launch Jan 20. Oh I guess I should say this is an Intel chip, if the 45nm or 2.5GHz didn't give it away!<BR/><BR/>And so the upperbound for all near term AMD quads.<BR/><BR/>And now the question is, what is better for AMD from a biz perspective a $200 quad core or 2, $100-120 dual core K8's (I think the K8's would probably be better for profit). I guess it is more important for Hector to save face than make money?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-48084785887781157102007-12-05T08:03:00.000+00:002007-12-05T08:03:00.000+00:00I'll likely get a single socket Nehalem system. Q...I'll likely get a single socket Nehalem system. Quad or Octa core would be excellent. That's eight to sixteen threads. <BR/><BR/>Apps like Houdini scale well with threads anyway. That, coupled with Nehalem's other performance enhancements will make it perform far faster than anything before it in terms of x86 CPUs.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04674699447174785970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-80100424763094438832007-12-05T07:12:00.000+00:002007-12-05T07:12:00.000+00:00core2dude"And in DP configuration, it will have 32...<B>core2dude</B><BR/><I>"And in DP configuration, it will have 32 threads--even Vista won't scale well to those many threads."</I><BR/><BR/>Who uses Windows with hihg-peroformance CPUs anyways. Linux all the way ;)Ho Hohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00177815588184912351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-72707233356068506092007-12-05T06:42:00.000+00:002007-12-05T06:42:00.000+00:00I'll want to see the retail reviews on the new Yor...<I><BR/>I'll want to see the retail reviews on the new Yorkfield quad cores. I'm especially interested in the overclocking<BR/></I><BR/>The eight-core Nehalem won't be cheap. And in DP configuration, it will have 32 threads--even Vista won't scale well to those many threads.core2dudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14977525379724928981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-17204383783376696592007-12-05T05:15:00.000+00:002007-12-05T05:15:00.000+00:00I predicted this months ago, and it has happened. ...I predicted this months ago, and it has happened. AMD is making No friends in the press.<BR/><BR/> Read this as HEXUS rakes WRECTUM RUINZ over the coals.<BR/><BR/>http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=10585<BR/><BR/><BR/>SPARKSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-2060947948441326092007-12-05T04:58:00.000+00:002007-12-05T04:58:00.000+00:00The bad news on Barcelona/Pheromones has hit the S...<I> The bad news on Barcelona/Pheromones has hit the Street fella’s, and it ain’t pretty. They took a 4.24 percent hit today, or 41 cents, this is big. This represent a low going back to July 2003.<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>Indeed, at the same time AMD's value dropped to 5.1bn. That's LESS than what they paid for Ati a little over a year ago!<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>I am thinking of skipping Penryn and directly going for Nehalem. That should be available in about 9 months. Any idea what SSE 4.2 includes on top of SSE 4?<BR/><BR/>I am thinking of building a V8 out of Nehalem. I hope Intel does not stumble on execution, now that AMD is no longer in the same league.</I><BR/><BR/>I'll want to see the retail reviews on the new Yorkfield quad cores. I'm especially interested in the overclocking. <BR/><BR/>As for Nehalem, it's going to be a monster. It's going to be crazy. I can't wait to get my hands on an OCTA core Nehalem CPU! :D My Houdini rendering will just fly on that sort of a setup. <BR/><BR/>Pat Gelsinger describes some of the Nehalem specific SSE4 instructions in his IDF keynote. AFAIK, Nehalem quad core is due out in H2'08, while Nehalem octa-core is due out in 2009.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04674699447174785970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-30702190086472208872007-12-04T23:49:00.000+00:002007-12-04T23:49:00.000+00:00Thanks giant, I dug about the things you mention i...Thanks giant, I dug about the things you mention in your comment and wrote a blog about it:<BR/><A HREF="http://chicagrafo.blogspot.com/2007/12/more-terrible-news-about-phenom-and-k10.html" REL="nofollow">more-terrible-news-about-phenom-and-k10.html</A>Eddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16847784119837035473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-61805552418594950292007-12-04T23:44:00.000+00:002007-12-04T23:44:00.000+00:00YES, it can.http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,...YES, it can.<BR/><BR/>http://www.extremetech.com/<BR/>article2/0,1697,2226939,00.asp<BR/><BR/><BR/>SPARKSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-78784836229951697172007-12-04T23:18:00.000+00:002007-12-04T23:18:00.000+00:00Then there is this. Can it get worse, I wonder?htt...Then there is this. Can it get worse, I wonder?<BR/><BR/>http://www.hexus.net/content/<BR/>item.php?item=10493Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-30290877365738468362007-12-04T23:14:00.000+00:002007-12-04T23:14:00.000+00:00The bad news on Barcelona/Pheromones has hit the S...The bad news on Barcelona/Pheromones has hit the Street fella’s, and it ain’t pretty. They took a 4.24 percent hit today, or 41 cents, this is big. This represent a low going back to July 2003. <BR/><BR/>Conversely, despite the overall market drop, INTC GAINED 6 cents on the dollar. If a market turn around comes into play, in the near future, plus a good 4Q earning report, INTC will take off. <BR/><BR/>Overall market conditions have been the limiting factor in INTC’s suppressed share price. INTC holding the line in this environment is no small feat. If the banks can get their act together…..!<BR/><BR/>SPARKS <BR/><BR/>http://moneycentral.msn.com/msn/<BR/>stock_quote?Symbol=amdAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-40451771310177011792007-12-04T23:03:00.000+00:002007-12-04T23:03:00.000+00:00www.amdzone.comTurn up your speakers and listen CL...www.amdzone.com<BR/><BR/>Turn up your speakers and listen CLOSELY, you can hear the crickets chirp.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-11961691802767228262007-12-04T19:04:00.000+00:002007-12-04T19:04:00.000+00:00Dude, I love your blog. I haven't posted yet but ...Dude, I love your blog. I haven't posted yet but I read your stuff all the time.<BR/><BR/>The analysis of facts is just awesome. You look at facts and come to a conclusion, rather than come to a conclusion and look for facts to support it.<BR/><BR/>You shouldn't be celebrating(jk), you should be looking for more information on this:<BR/><BR/>http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13087<BR/><BR/>and this:<BR/><BR/>http://techreport.com/blogs.x/swasson<BR/><BR/>It's just a single source, but I have a feeling we'll be getting confirmations of it soon enough.<BR/><BR/>Thank you Roborat.Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03882302503203420805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-27512049146167438132007-12-04T17:03:00.000+00:002007-12-04T17:03:00.000+00:00yeah, time has passed. I still remember why I star...yeah, time has passed. I still remember why I started blogging (few months before C2D launched)... yeah because of stupid comments posted by Sharikou ALL over the tech related net, with his blog link advertised :). <BR/><BR/>And eventually Sci joined in the game, and at first I <I>thought</I> he would be much better than Sharikou but the reverse ... ;)<BR/><BR/>I enjoy reading/posting in this blog. GPTB! ;)pointerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17388854963223201475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-49992888615444571582007-12-04T16:29:00.000+00:002007-12-04T16:29:00.000+00:00Happy Anniversary. Keep up the good work!Happy Anniversary. Keep up the good work!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02198595366359423632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-72864385616254469792007-12-04T16:16:00.000+00:002007-12-04T16:16:00.000+00:00Congrats on your milestone. Sorry I haven't been ...Congrats on your milestone. Sorry I haven't been able to contribute as much in the past year- the move to a startup has left no time for any sort of insightful commentary, and I ain't one just to make noise, unlike many on those "other" blogs. <BR/><BR/>I hope you and the others here continue to prop up the level of discussion in the blogosphere.anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05329810566133103390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-10805131966174027102007-12-04T14:51:00.000+00:002007-12-04T14:51:00.000+00:00Roborat- congratulations on your modest milestone,...Roborat- congratulations on your modest milestone, it's been enjoyable to read and participate here.<BR/><BR/>Guru- I think you can get a google/blogger account and still remain anonymous. Either way I do enjoy reading the commentary from you and the other people who are involved in CPU design and/or production, even if much of it sails over my head.Tonushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01082528970434639776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-72928022821100205022007-12-04T09:01:00.000+00:002007-12-04T09:01:00.000+00:00Congrats on building up this blog. As for guest p...Congrats on building up this blog. As for guest posters/bloggers, email is a good option as some folks like myself (some call me Guru), prefer to remain anonymous. <BR/><BR/>Or perhaps you can just split off a freestanding blog (don't know if this is possible) for potential new topics or blog submissions - like having a blog suggestion/submssion link on the left of the main page.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-25839421987410627232007-12-04T08:13:00.000+00:002007-12-04T08:13:00.000+00:00giantI also fully intend on purchasing a Yorkfield...<B><BR/>giant<BR/></B><BR/><I><BR/>I also fully intend on purchasing a Yorkfield quad core come January.<BR/></I><BR/>I am thinking of skipping Penryn and directly going for Nehalem. That should be available in about 9 months. Any idea what SSE 4.2 includes on top of SSE 4?<BR/><BR/>I am thinking of building a V8 out of Nehalem. I hope Intel does not stumble on execution, now that AMD is no longer in the same league.core2dudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14977525379724928981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-25723073686250845152007-12-04T06:40:00.000+00:002007-12-04T06:40:00.000+00:00Congrats on one year, i found this site through 18...Congrats on one year, i found this site through 180Sharikou, I have always read scientia's blog but don't think i posted more than once or twice, mainly becasue he is so blind into thinking he is open minded, anyhow keep up the good work, i'll continue reading,<BR/><BR/>BTW my name came about becaue Penix posted some garbage (suprize suprize) and i had to prove him wrong)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2602471396566186819.post-29266337355003820802007-12-04T05:25:00.000+00:002007-12-04T05:25:00.000+00:00GIANT! Great Link!http://techreport.com/discussion...GIANT! Great Link!<BR/><BR/>http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13724<BR/><BR/>This is a must read!<BR/><BR/>SPARKSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com